Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fawzia Peer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Killiondude (talk) 06:50, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Fawzia Peer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Deputy mayor is not a notable post. No indication of being notable and important for anything else in the article. Doesn't deserve an article on its own yet. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 11:23, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:BIO.  Lourdes  14:54, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Pinging to request them to check out the above sources. Thanks,  Lourdes  15:01, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:46, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:47, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:47, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. While it's true that deputy mayor is not an inherently notable post that confers automatic notability on every deputy mayor of everywhere per se, it is a post that can fall under WP:NPOL #2 ("major local political figures who can show significant press coverage") if sufficient sourcing can be shown to exist. Lourdes has shown the evidence that such coverage exists here, and Durban is a large and internationally prominent city where even more coverage can be quite reasonably expected to exist. Yes, the article needs improvement, but the evidence shows that it's improvable. Bearcat (talk) 16:59, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - I read all the coverage, and it's all routine. There's nothing written about her that's unique, and the coverage includes very little that could be used to flush her biography out and do the article justice. Fails WP:GNG. Nothing I can find even substantiates the career history in the infobox.  If she succeeds the mayor then we can revisit - but I'm not going to stress too much over losing a one line article. TimTempleton (talk)  (cont)  01:18, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 08:38, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep The city he's deputy mayor is a large manufacturing and business hub which will give him more edge to pass WP:NPOL #2 than other mayors of smaller or less economically important cities in the world. –Ammarpad (talk) 03:01, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * This is a female deputy mayor who has otherwise no discernible notability. TimTempleton (talk) (cont)  18:36, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * My mistake in writing her gender incorrectly has nothing whatsoever to do with her notability. Please keep calm, since you already provided your thought above. –Ammarpad (talk) 20:16, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Just wanted to make sure you had a chance to properly review the coverage before weighing in. TimTempleton (talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  21:19, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - all the coverage is routine PR stuff and nothing to make this person notable Gbawden (talk) 14:11, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:51, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello, hope you're doing well. I just wanted to quickly check your view on sources like this and this. In my opinion, they don't seem like PR, so wanted you to have a look. Warmly,  Lourdes  05:34, 26 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.