Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fayat Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure)

Fayat Group

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not finding sources indicating a pass of WP:GNG or WP:CORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Sources I've found so far amount to press releases and minor coverage. An earlier attempt at PROD due to lack of notability was unsuccessful. ASUKITE 14:19, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  ASUKITE  14:19, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  ASUKITE  14:19, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 *  Keep or merge - Keep, or merge to BOMAG, one of its subsidiaries. --Jax 0677 (talk) 01:14, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 *  Keep or merge  How can a subsidiary be notable but not its parent? link to its French page page? [[Fayat]]--KalaDude (talk) 23:15, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Simple - Notability is not 'important' or 'influential' or 'successful'. It's 'the extent to which something has been the topic of media coverage' the extent to which it has been noted. Its subsidiary has been noted more than the parent - Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail 01:53, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 03:15, 15 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🌀 Locomotive207 - talk  🌀  23:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 02:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as there are independent research reports providing in-depth independent analysis - for example this and this. Article could use some improvement but that's not an issue for AfD.  HighKing++ 14:55, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: Coverage in paywalled sectoral reports may not be sufficient, but there is also recent coverage such as this analysis in Les Echos (regional). AllyD (talk) 13:20, 7 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.