Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faye Travel Insurance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. CSD G7. If an editor wants to work on this article in Draft space, contact me or make a request at WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 23:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Faye Travel Insurance

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Company that fails WP:NCORP. On this page, sources 1, 5, and 7 are WP:ORGTRIV coverage of capital raises. Source 2 is coverage of a Faye founder and does not reference the subject. Sources 3 and 10 are commercial, commission-driven review sites paired with Faye's advertising (editorially not under the Wall Street Journal newsroom, caveat lector!). Source 6 is a WP:INTERVIEW. Source 8 provides passing mention of the subject, not significant coverage, and Source 9 appears to be sponsor content/paid placement since there is a clear VentureBeat editorial disclaimer at the bottom. Additional sources found in WP:BEFORE search are sponsor content, trivial coverage, or other reviews on commission-driven websites. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Travel and tourism,  and Israel. Owen&times;  &#9742;  15:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a startup. Startups are usually not notable. Exceptions exist yet not for Faye. gidonb (talk) 13:11, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment - I am the one who reviewed this at AfC and you can see discussion on the talk page in that regard, as well as my talk page. I am tough on company sourcing and will say there are at least two sources that go beyond WP:ROUTINE and meet WP:ORGCRIT. However, the argument would be moot at this point since page creator has requested deletion on my talk page. I advised them to come here but would say that moving it back to draft would be a good WP:ATD based on their deletion request. --CNMall41 (talk) 08:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi @CNMall41 - thanks for your work at AfC. What sources do you think meet ORGCRIT? If the original editor wants to draftify, I'm happy to agree to that as an AtD. Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I am only going off the message they left on my talk page and obviously they have not opined here yet. I moved a copy to my userspace and can take up the task sometime in the future when I feel like digging deeper. Feel free to delete, move to draft, or whatever.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.