Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faylo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:51, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Faylo

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable surname. I have searched for sources, but have been unable to verify the information in the article. This article cannot be turned into a disambiguation page because no Wikipedia articles contain this name. Cunard (talk) 05:53, 23 September 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:35, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. (Speedy! Hoax!) Come on Cunard, I asked for a challenge, not for an obvious example of bullshit. Even if this information were true, an obituary from a Toledo paper (ProQuest listed the name in an article, but not the rest of the obit--yeah, I looked it up) is not an authority on any linguistic matters. Besides, Paul Faylo is a WW2 veteran; perhaps the editor who came up with this crap can explain how Faylo changed his name when, as one would imagine, he was a grown man. User:Yeshua Ka-Kalei Asa-Faylo, please clarify your sources, or look like a you-know-what. Drmies (talk) 05:17, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 12:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 12:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per nom. Is this some sort of a hoax? JBsupreme (talk) 07:52, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing here suggests that this surname is notable, and nothing here is verifiable except possibly the fact that one non-notable person changed his surname to this name, although I haven't actually been able to verify that yet. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 13:15, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.