Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faysal Manzoor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clear consensus to keep. Discussion of sources can be done on article's talk page from now (NAC) (non-admin closure) Nightfury 13:18, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Faysal Manzoor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines and lacks non-trivial coverage from independent reliable sources. Steps were taken to locate sources WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful. Saqib (talk) 14:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep as article have strong sources and it does meet Wikipedia notability guidelines. Sources mention the subject properly and have sources from notable websites. Lillyput4455 (talk) 19:29, 1 January 2019 (UTC)


 * No. The article does not cite strong sources. --Saqib (talk) 05:48, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Interviews of a person are considered as strong cite to provide, there are 2 interviews there which strongly support the subject, also other sources contain strong information about subject projects and achievements.Both sources explore subject notability which is appropriate and meet Wikipedia guidelines WP:PERSON. Lillyput4455 (talk) 01:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ― Abelmoschus Esculentus  talk /  contribs 14:50, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ― Abelmoschus Esculentus  talk /  contribs 14:50, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. ― Abelmoschus Esculentus  talk /  contribs 14:50, 1 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep passes WP:Creative as has worked on many nationally broadcast television series of note in Pakistan. Also there are two reliable sources referenced in the article which devote entire articles to him, particularly the first one from The Daily Times which has two or three paragraphs of solid information about him in prose before the interview section. Atlantic306 (talk) 19:47, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Among two reliable sources, one is a blog post which longstanding practice holds cannot be used to support the notability of the subject. Only one RS (Daily Times) is not enough to establish WP:N. --Saqib (talk) 05:47, 2 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep as article contains reliable citations and meet the subject notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.195.43.30 (talk) 14:29, 7 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.