Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fazeri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Philippe 19:20, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Fazeri

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I have nominated the article for deletion based on the below reasons: 1- Newly-coined words or terms (neologisms) not supported by reliable sources 2- Fails to meet the relevant notability guideline (WP:N) 3- Article cannot be attributed to reliable sources 4- It is not suitable for an encyclopedia (via WP:SOAP : Wikipedia is not a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda and advertising.) --alidoostzadeh (talk) 03:58, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - The page is an obvious violation of WP:NEO, WP:NOTABILITY and WP:COATRACK. --CreazySuit (talk) 04:55, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment This article has had a content dispute involving the nominator, which became a mess on the article's talk. Might want to go through that before making a !vote. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 05:18, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:NEO - not notable neologism Alex Bakharev (talk) 05:33, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, it should have been speedy deleted in the first place. --Pejman47 (talk) 06:51, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable and very little information is available from neutral sources. Nokhodi (talk) 07:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete One reference (from the coiner) does not prove this is a notable term. --Folantin (talk) 08:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with Ali Doostzadeh. Also see the discussion in its respective talk page.--Babakexorramdin (talk) 16:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Folantin.--Berig (talk) 18:33, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom NN Dreamspy (talk) 21:16, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism. --Irpen 06:48, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep or Rename, there is a discussion on the talk page and additional references relevant to the subject. Topic about the linguistic and cultural abuse of identity against at least 16 million people cannot be non-noteable.Atabek (talk) 18:26, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The ensuing comments have been moved to Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Fazeri. We shouldn't be cluttering up the AfD page with lengthy back and forth arguments and discussions on any and every topic that arises. Lengthy discussions should be confined to the talk page. --CreazySuit (talk) 00:01, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong delete Non-notable term, I’d wish editors to take careful care in reading Atabek additions which have no relevancy, and to not be mislead with the current length of the article which was artificially doubled with background which would rather fit in other more appropriate articles. The arguments surrounding the request for deletion has little to do with the articles size, Atabek should take note on that. VartanM (talk) 00:19, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, it can't be renamed ! the whole article is about a newly-coined word or term.--Alborz Fallah (talk) 08:31, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.