Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feast of Fools (podcast)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete Mr.  Z- man  01:16, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Feast of Fools (podcast)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Tagged as unverified and lacking sources for a loooong time, no sources have been provided. Photo is credited nicely, though, which must please the photographer. Anyway, there are an unusual number of different single purpose accounts in the history of this article, notably, plus some real editors. The article itself does not in my view establish why we should care, but it does do a decent job of promoting the thing. Noth that we are here for promotion. Guy (Help!) 16:52, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: The link to the People's Choice Awards is incorrect. The show won the Podcast Awards People's Choice Award, which is an entirely different award.  http://www.podcastawards.com/, not http://www.pcavote.com/pca/index.jsp Corvus cornix 17:08, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete if nobody adds sources. User:Feastoffools looks like WP:COI. Isaac Pankonin 02:51, 21 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Delete article is written like a promotional piece for the show, especially the intro and the section on regulars. With the nicely credited photo, one would not be surprised someone involved in the show didn't create this article so as to know how to get the aptly credited photo.--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 02:56, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article needs improving through regular editing not deletion by AfD process. Benjiboi 10:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.