Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feastarian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 23:23, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Feastarian

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Neologism, unsourced, and I can find no reliable sources myself, 19 google hits in total. Amalthea 12:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Deletarian - dead-on-arrival neologism, with POV problems to boot. AlexTiefling (talk) 12:50, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NOTDICTIONARY, and there's nothing to say about this word other than a definition of it. JulesH (talk) 13:07, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn neologism. andy (talk) 13:16, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article simply defines Feastarian. WP:NOTDICTIONARY states: "Although articles should begin with a good definition and description of one topic, they should provide other types of information about that topic as well. Articles that contain nothing more than a definition should be expanded with additional encyclopedic content, if possible." In this case, I don't think we can expanded the article with additional encyclopedic content. AdjustShift (talk) 13:44, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I prodded it previously and endorse it's deletion as a nn neologism.—Sandahl (talk) 16:35, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:MADEUP, WP:NEO . Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 04:19, 25 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.