Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feature (horse)

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Postdlf 01:12, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

Feature (horse)
After doing some digging, I have been able to find information on horses by the names of "Feature Mr Jess", "Feature EM Frost", "Feature EM Blue", "Feature Good", "Feature Jack", "Frosty Feature", "Kass Tuff Feature", and "Quincy Feature" but nothing on a horse named "Feature" outside of wikipedia mirrors. Is this a real horse? --Allen3 talk 21:58, May 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. A perfect example of the type of article that should be eliminated.  The entire article is the single sentence, "Feature is the name of a famous American Quarter Horse stud.". Not enough info to verify, and absolutely no loss if it were deleted.  Quale 23:38, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unverifiable. Megan1967 05:29, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Not only unverifiable, but nearly useless even if it could be verified. IMO, these single-sentence nanostubs should be blasted out of the water on sight.  Unverifiable ones even more so.  Did I mention delete? - Lucky 6.9 03:27, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.