Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fecal vomiting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was unambiguous keep. Luna Santin 20:21, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Fecal vomiting
Can someone please explain how this has managed to survive over a year here on Wikipedia? No sources save for a weak one-off reference to a single South Park episode and a link to "poopreport.com" ??? Send this back from whence it came and do not merge or redirect. SamKinney 23:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong delete unsourced, unverifiable. Tulkolahten 23:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per zzuuzz. Tulkolahten 19:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:V. --Mig (Talk) 00:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Zzuuzz --Mig (Talk) 02:10, 27 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep and add this reference -- zzuuzz (talk) 00:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete wkipedia is not for things made up on south park meshach 00:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - Did you notice that the term has been around since at least 1925? -- zzuuzz (talk) 00:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Zzuuzz. This is, oddly enough, a real medical condition. --- RockMFR 00:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Zzuuzz. Kukini 02:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - This was even featured on the medical drama "House" one episode even. It's not uncommon, but the South Park section would no doubt be offputting & is nearly as big as the rest of the article... Spawn Man 02:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * What are your sources that confirm this is not uncommon? SamKinney 04:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Well I have a good fecal vomit every night if I'm stressed by editors asking me for sources. Clears the sinus really well ya know... Spawn Man 05:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Zzuuzz. Wow. Learn something new every day. Shudder. NeoFreak 04:54, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. People need to know that this does happen, however rare it is. Imagine an abnormally large obstruction in your large intestine, eg. cancer or constipation. The brownie has already been produced by the time it finds that the road is blocked off and if it can't get past the obstruction, then it has no other way to go but up. Scott Gall 07:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete South Park as a source of medical info and a 1925 article do not satisfy the need for reliable references. Edison 20:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * South Park is irrelevant now. The source is medical article. Why do you think medical archive is not reliable reference please ? Tulkolahten 20:19, 27 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Holy poop on a stick! Keep and expand. More sourcing is definitely needed. B.Wind 03:54, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and remove the trivial South Park reference. This serious medical condition has little to do with the cartoon reference.  RFerreira 02:12, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I would rather to keep article as it is before the AfD conclusion. It's better for other voters. Tulkolahten 22:56, 29 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep. Rare, unpleasant, and real. WMMartin 18:31, 30 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.