Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FedEx Flight 597


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:01, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

FedEx Flight 597
This is not a major aviation incident. No one died, the cause of the crash is not peculiar; its just a plane that crashed. It has no encyclopedic value. – Zntrip 00:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. the plane just suffered some damage, it didn't crash and no one died. TJ Spyke 00:47, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not even a crash. They had mechanical trouble and had to turn around. A few people didn't get their packages on time the next morning. So what? Fan-1967 00:48, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Things like this happen all the time. And what are the concequences? A few late packages and a plane that needs fixing. --Supermath 01:39, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Current event that's no longer current. Hard to tell whether it is in any way unique until we have the final NTSB report. Does anyone know the rest of the story? Williamborg (Bill) 03:20, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as it fails notability. Wikipedia is not an "aviation incident" database. --Dhartung | Talk 04:12, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It can be, but this is not a notable incident. - Mgm|(talk) 09:37, 15 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not a database of incidents. See also Articles for deletion/FedEx Flight 7145. Pavel Vozenilek 22:16, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. per above. —dima/s-ko/ 03:03, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above Hello32020 17:56, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOT an indiscriminant collection of info. -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk) 17:36, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator; no casualties, not particularly notable. Yamaguchi先生 23:41, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.