Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Federico Alberto Cuello Camilo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  TheSpecialUser TSU 01:54, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Federico Alberto Cuello Camilo

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Poorly written, looks like advert (mostly by reason of major contributor claiming to be affiliated with subject), appears to be non-notable. ⁓ Hello 71 02:26, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete his excellency. WP:RESUME --MoonLichen (talk) 04:45, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 22 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:DIPLOMAT (e.g. ). Examination of GBooks and GNews shows he easily passes WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. With that said, I agree that the article is bloated with primary source material and reads like an advert or resume. Suggest that it be stubified. Location (talk) 16:17, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. A lack of substantial verifiable, independent sources to confim notability amongst all this puffery.Jimsteele9999 (talk) 20:13, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:GNG. Page should be cleaned up, not delete. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 02:03, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Easily passes WP:BIO. Not only has he held multiple important diplomatic positions (two appointments as ambassador, representative to the UN, representative to the WTO), he's been the subject of non-trivial coverage in reliable third-party sources (See the two links provided above plus for instance    ) Now the current tone of the article isn't acceptable but that's not a reason for deletion. I agree that it should be turned into a stub containing only the basic facts of his diplomatic career (at least those which appear in the sources listed in this discussion and in the article) Pichpich (talk) 13:46, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TheSpecialUser TSU 10:54, 29 August 2012 (UTC)




 * Keep Sourced coverage regarding significant diplomatic appointments. Some cleanup would be good, but the subject is notable.  It doesn't even seem borderline--Cube lurker (talk) 13:46, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep: Topic is notable - held multiple important diplomatic positions - Ret.Prof (talk) 19:39, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.