Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FeedFeeds

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty 06:40, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

FeedFeeds
Only 50 Google hits, doesn't try and state notability, seems to be vanity and advertisement Halo 09:48, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: JosephSamuel, a related article by the same author is also VFDed. Halo 09:58, 30 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Comment:Its a new service. Give them a chance. Does wikki add a page based on google hits only?


 * Delete; nothing notable about this service compared to thousands of others. Sdedeo 19:52, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

--Jose sam 03:02, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Please Keep: Please dont delete this without even trying it. It has a few google hits because of two reasons : 1) Its started just a few weeks ago. 2)I dont have enough resource or marketing power to increase the google hits(because this is developed as an individual effort). Give this a chance.. the rankings will follow.. I have no objection in deleting the other page about me, but please dont delete this. The article was created in similar way of a similar service, where there was a link to the page of its creator. So I followed it. If that was wrong, please delete the other page(about me), but please leave this page. I humbly request you to try the service before concluding that there is nothing notable in this.


 * Delete; Not unique or popular enough to be notable. Wikipedia&rsquo;s purpose is not to provide marketing but information on established topics. - FlooK 18:01, 31 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete; Not any different than hundreds of others. If it gets popular enough and unique enough to warrant a unique entry, then a unique entry can be created then. For now, there is no reason to have this cluttering up wikipedia. The site doesn't even do what the author says it does.
 * Delete. "Its started just a few weeks ago." Well, fine, good luck with it (seriously), but please come back when it's of wider note. MCB 07:32, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

So I kindly request to consider these while taking a decision on this. --Jose sam 17:44, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: I completely respect the comments of all other members who all are more experienced with wiki process. But after reading through the wiki policies I came to know the following points. I hope those are applicable for this case also.
 * Lack of fame doesnot constitute Vanity
 * Lack of notability is not a criterion for deletion.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.