Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feed the Wolf


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Red Paintings. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃  (ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 23:35, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Feed the Wolf

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Redirect to band's page. This particular album isn't very notable, not enough ample coverage. Citations consist of user-generated reviews and trivial mentions in articles about the band's touring, for the most part. Mooonswimmer 23:41, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs, Music,  and Australia.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:30, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Red Paintings. You may have noticed that a lot has been happening lately with the articles for this band and its many independent album releases. Some of their albums qualify for their own articles, but I don't think this one does. As the nominator said, it is dependent on sources that are brief announcements of its existence, or user-generated bloggy reviews, or things describing the band's larger history. I can find nothing else useful. Articles for many of the band's other albums have recently been redirected to their main article, and there is little reason not to do the same here. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 17:22, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Red Paintings. Fails WP:NALBUM per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 00:23, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I think there are sufficient independent reliable sources to pass WP:ALBUM and have this as a stand-alone article. I have recently supplied further reviews of the EP. shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 07:29, 23 April 2022 (UTC) Redirect I have been convinced by the following arguments to change my position. Let this article lead to parent article's discography.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 15:53, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Could you point them out? Only two of the articles cited seems to help the album fulfill WP:ALBUM, and I can't really vouch for their reliability. Mooonswimmer 16:50, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment There are at least three reviews: Current ref [5] theDwarf.com.au, ref [6] FasterLouder.com.au and ref [11] The Program. shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:53, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Ref [5] leads to a seemingly user-generated review by "iain69", who has about 5 reviews on "TheDwarf". How exactly is that significant, reliable coverage? Same goes for the review on FasterLouder. Written by NiteShok, a teenage "contributor" to the site, which is a status easily attained after you create an account on the platform and demonstrate some interest by submitting an application. Not sure about Ref [11], but it might not be independent coverage, even if it did count as significant. Mooonswimmer 03:01, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
 * See the user-generated content section within the guidelines for reliable sources. Reviews written by fans and consumers are not reliable, instead we need reviews written by professionals with editorial oversight. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 14:09, 24 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.