Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feedback magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Punkmorten 21:49, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Feedback magazine
Contested prod that is blatant spam. MER-C 11:59, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - advert Nigel (Talk) 13:42, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - spam. BTLizard 14:54, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Magazine Article, other magazines do not get deleted or marked as spam / adverts. Why this one? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RYKTP (talk • contribs).
 * Comment Because the magazine fails notability and because the article has no analysis of its subject; it's just a peg on which to hang a link to the magazine's website. BTLizard 11:25, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Clearly no chance of being notable, yet. Not backed by major publisher, and Official website says "first issue is due out soon". WP:NOT crystal ball; WP:NOT webspace provider. Ohconfucius 04:21, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.