Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feeders (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:04, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Feeders (film)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable film Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  05:01, 7 November 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:09, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per, , , , and . Joe Chill (talk) 14:14, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Possible Keep: even though this film may be put into the "it's so bad, it's good" catagory, it now seems to have attracted something of a cult status. There is a fair bit of info out there about it too. (Mr Real Natural (talk) 05:24, 13 November 2009 (UTC))
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Per Joe Chill and Mr. Real Natural's observations. Plus, the film and its creators were cited in this book: . Warrah (talk) 03:56, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: Coverage in reliable sources seems to be established. —  Hunter  Kahn  ( c )  07:13, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.