Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feeding Fingers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 23:05, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Feeding Fingers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:N, there's no hint of notability. Also concerned at the edit history of this and Justin Curfman, there may be WP:COI as well. Hiding T 14:45, 8 September 2016 (UTC) Hiding T 14:45, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:39, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete there's a whole cluster of articles on this band which also show to fail notability - David Gerard (talk) 13:39, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:53, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 17:59, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:54, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find independent, reliable sources which discuss the topic. Well-written, but obviously promotional.    78.26   (spin me / revolutions) 20:41, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PROMO; strictly a vanity page. Does not meet WP:NBAND and COI editing is definitely a concern as neutrality of this article would have to be watched closely. Keeping such promotional articles on insignificant subjects is not in the best interest of the project. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:33, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as the information is simply expected, but the sources are now a serious concern because that's why is supported and supplied by everywhere, and they are honestly not at all convincing, everything else suggests there's nothing for a convincing article, and therefore, it has the essence of suggesting there would not be meaningful improvements. SwisterTwister   talk  06:42, 30 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.