Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feedlooks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete under G7. — ξ xplicit  19:21, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Feedlooks

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unremarkable product. “It was developed […] in April-May of 2010 and is currently under public "beta"”, therefore it is non-notable. — Zhernovoi (talk) 21:21, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:25, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 21:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: according to the rare sources not notable at all. Dewritech (talk) 22:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, I've read the significant coverage article, and I agree it should be deleted.Artur adib (talk) 18:54, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.