Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feefighters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 05:42, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Feefighters

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Originally prodded by me with the rationale which I still stand by: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (organizations) requirement". Yes. the article has been mentioned by some big media - in passing, in one or two articles. Deprodded by User:TonyTheTiger who requested an AfD - so here we are. We know that it exists, but until it is a subject of non-trivial (non-passing) coverage, I don't think it meets the requirements listed above. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:14, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 11:01, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 11:01, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 11:02, 5 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep The Inc. and Entrepreneur articles indicate that this company is topical in reliable sources.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 08:06, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:39, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Weak Keep- Initially it looks failing to meet notability, while a deep Google search it seems like to marginally pass notability. Ireneshih (talk) 07:52, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 12:09, 18 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.