Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feelings (Aliki book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Legacypac (talk) 06:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Feelings (Aliki book)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No books by Aliki Brandenberg have articles and a children's book with no references and just a list of contents for an article is not convincing as an article Legacypac (talk) 02:52, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. No independent sources have been provided, and the contents list and trivia that make up most of this article are not going to be useful to Wikipedia readers unless they have the book Feelings in their hands as they read this article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:05, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep because the article now has sources thanks to the efforts of User:Megalibrarygirl. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:13, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:28, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:27, 19 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment, why library holdings can be a good indication of possible notability only, according to WorldCat this book is held by 1400 libraries, so i was surprised by the dearth of reviews online or otherwise, curious that article creator chose this Aliki book and not one of the others that do have reviews (allbeit tradies:)). Coolabahapple (talk) 08:33, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep I rewrote the article. Finding reviews for books from the 1980s is daunting. There's several reviews and of course, the Reading Rainbow episode. to see what you think. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:19, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Given the rewrite, I'll withdraw. Legacypac (talk) 22:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Great rescue job, article now reflects this book meeting WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK so this is definitely a keep from me. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:34, 20 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.