Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feelsoof-e-Islam Allama Adeel Akhtar Zaidi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. carried out the decision but seems to have forgotten to close the AfD. —David Eppstein (talk) 10:29, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Feelsoof-e-Islam Allama Adeel Akhtar Zaidi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No sources cited, and no evidence of existence found on searching. Either a hoax or totally unnotable person written up by proud family member. Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  05:21, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Verifiability. My searches for sources about this individual have not been fruitful. Cunard (talk) 11:01, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I really can't see at all what assertion of notability was being made in this article (a bland "He was a prominent researcher of his time" should not count, IMO), the speedy should have been allowed to stand. There's nothing here, just a bio of a random guy. Tarc (talk) 14:03, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence he satisfies WP:BIO. Why is the article tagged as an "autobiography" when it says he was born in 1315? Would he be notable for extreme longevity is he is still editing Wikipedia at the age of 695? Edison (talk) 17:19, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The article says he died in 1951, but the 1315 (Hijri) is on the Islamic calender, which would be 1901 CE.--Prosfilaes (talk) 02:26, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 19:31, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. Fails WP:V, no evidence of existence. Nsk92 (talk) 02:47, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Zero sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:06, 17 December 2010 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.