Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feijen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Niels Feijen. ✗ plicit  12:07, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Feijen

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The article does not provide relevant information on the surname as such. It is merely a very short list of people with this surname, and only one has an article on Wikipedia. It looks more like a disambiguation page but with only one article there is no need for disambiguation. On the dutch and german sites a "Feijen" disambiguation page exists but a surname page cannot be linked to a disambiguation page on Wikidata. As it stands, there is not enough information for a surname page and no need for a disambiguation page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruud Buitelaar (talk • contribs) 2022-04-22T03:15:26 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2022 April 22.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 03:30, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to Niels Feijen as an R from surname, given he's currently the only notable individual by the name. Sean Stephens (talk) 04:52, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * For information, de:Feijen and nl:Feijen both list Loek Feijen and the latter also lists Stef Feijen. From a quick look around I can find no indication that the lives and works of the entomologists have been independently documented, for biographies to be written.  Nor of the materials scientist.  Uncle G (talk) 09:40, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:50, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Niels Feijen. This is trivial. AfD was not needed. Thanks for caring nevertheless! gidonb (talk) 18:35, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Seems useless to keep as a dab unless interlanguage links to the other Wikis are inserted—no opinion on that, nor apparently is there a guideline for (or against) that practice. Otherwise, redirect.—Bagumba (talk) 09:19, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Opposing to a disambiguation page based on Nlwiki links. There is too little quality there. gidonb (talk) 23:06, 27 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.