Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feitian Technologies Co., Ltd.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 12:12, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Feitian Technologies Co., Ltd.

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

From the prod: No independent sources cited, and no evidence of notability found. Article is promotional in character. Eeekster (talk) 04:04, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Not as notable as SanDisk or such. Big  top  みんな空の下  (  トーク  ) 05:17, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Did some massive cleanup of the advert tone and various other things, and restored the afd tag removed by the article author. Could be notable, but since the author is obviously chinese and obviously originally advertorial (sp) in tone.... note that one of the [two] sources, "en.factolex.com", is actually mirroring the former state of the wikipedia article. Fails basic verification policy right now big time, not to mention most of the stuff that might make it pass WP:CORP is unreferenced. Ryan Norton 08:16, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Author has created several pages for different  dongle-type computer accesories, all  with  strongly  advertising  tones.--Kudpung (talk) 08:01, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment All of the articles created by this author except this one have been deleted as copyright violations. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:22, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - it  was obviously  created for advertorial  purposes, and even when trying  to  find sources to  keep it  the lack of anything to assert notability   means it  has to  go.--Kudpung (talk) 12:39, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Not that I disagree with the jist of what you say, but assuming the awards can be sourced somehow, it MIGHT make it close to being notable. Ryan Norton 18:23, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:26, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:26, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.