Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felicia (pharmacy)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). The notion of a page move can be further discussed on the article's talk page, or perhaps boldly performed. North America1000 04:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Felicia (pharmacy)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There's a decent claim to notability here - one of Moldova's leading pharmacy chains - but try as I might, and I did search diligently in Romanian, I can't find any independent coverage of this firm. True, there's this and this, but I have several problems with those links. First, the text is exactly the same on both sites, suggesting we're dealing with publicity material. Second, this text indeed a laudatory one, with little attempt at balance. Third, one of the links is a gossip/fashion magazine, the other a men's magazine, neither of which is really the type of high-quality reference one might want to establish the notability of a pharmacy. - Biruitorul Talk 22:39, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Moldova-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Move to Dorian Berdos, who at least has a very thorough article at http://www.vipmagazin.md/profil/Dorian_Berdos._Un_filozof_al_afacerilor/. It will be a stub for a time, but eventually, if he gets enough press, it will made a strong article. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 06:30, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:39, 13 May 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:23, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.