Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feliciano Canaveris


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No arguments were made to assert or establish the subject's notability. ✗ plicit  11:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Feliciano Canaveris

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:BASIC due to a lack of multiple, in-depth secondary sources. With the exception of a secondary 1853 book in which he receives a passing mention in a list of assassinated victims, Captain Canaveris receives only primary passing coverage which helps with WP:V but not WP:N. Initial edits to this page and connected bio pages suggest an attempt at using Wikipedia as a genealogy website (WP:NOTGENEALOGY). Pilaz (talk) 21:18, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Pilaz (talk) 21:18, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Pilaz (talk) 21:18, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Pilaz (talk) 21:18, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uruguay-related deletion discussions. Pilaz (talk) 21:18, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 07:18, 2 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment. Editors should be made aware that a sockpuppet investigation has determined that the two most prolific contributors to the page were socks of a 2015 sockpuppeteer. By my calculations, at least 92% of the character edits to this page are tainted by sockpuppeteering. I don't think a speedy delete under WP:G5 would apply here because some non-minor edits were made to the page by other editors. Pilaz (talk) 22:14, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Articles can't be tainted by sockpuppets, only discussions (AFD, DYK, RFA, GAR etc) can. Now, block evasion is another thing. Geschichte (talk) 09:59, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:50, 9 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 02:57, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment -- Taking the article at face value, he was merely an officer in certain armies, probably not with a high enough rank to be notable without more. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:37, 5 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.