Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felicity Tree


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure) .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:03, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Felicity Tree

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

She has a notable family Tree, but she can't inherit from it. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:47, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  sst ✈  05:04, 6 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -agree per nom, notability is not inherited and upon a quick search, I couldn't find any reliable sources that would support her own notability
 * Keep She was like a Kardashian of her time. She pops up in several journals and magazines from the time. If she wasn't notable, she wouldn't be in these journals. I've started adding the sources. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I've been adding journals and periodicals. She was in The New York Times, The Strand, The Sketch, the London Evening News... and many more. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep as the article's starter. The page is a useful article and link in the British aristocracy series. As a member of the famous Beerbohm family she garnered much media interest during her life time. Jack1956 (talk) 21:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. The subject received international press over a period of many years.  She married into the aristocracy and was the daughter of a leading actor of the day, Sir Herbert Beerbohm Tree. -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:43, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep – The subject is sufficiently notable to have five portraits of her in the National Portrait Gallery (the notability of the sitter being the criterion for inclusion in the collection). Clearly merits a suitable Wikipedia article.  Tim riley  talk    09:36, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep – Given the wide range of mentions in several different news publications (and a few books too), there is notability there. - SchroCat (talk) 11:23, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Withdraw nomination due to enormous improvement (even though I only see Kardashian-like celebrity). Clarityfiend (talk) 13:48, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Clarityfiend, permit me to say that I think your withdrawal is most gracious, and in the true spirit of WP editing. Best,  Tim riley  talk    15:09, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.