Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felipe Tristan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Felipe Tristan

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Semi-advertorialized article about an orchestra conductor, not properly referenced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. While there are notability claims being made here, they're referenced almost entirely to primary sources and YouTube videos, rather than reliable source coverage about his career in the media -- and while there are a couple of media hits lightly sprinkled on top of all the junk sourcing, there aren't enough to claim that he would pass WP:GNG. Furthermore, not every music award that exists is always an automatic free pass over NMUSIC's award criterion -- includability on that basis still comes down to the quality and independence of the sources that you can or can't show to support the award claims, because it's necessary to establish that an award is a notable one (i.e. one that gets media coverage) before it can confer notability on its winners. There's also a possible conflict of interest of some sort here, as the creator used the edit summary "Add my all information, myself, my early life and my career and about my self" -- however, they also used the same edit summary to create Draft:Bred Lambert about a completely different person, so this is more likely to be a paid public relations consultant rather than Tristan himself (effectively confirmed by the fact that the editor's deleted contributions also include a version of his own userpage in which he described himself as an "expert SEO professional and digital marketing".) But that's still COI regardless, and paid editing is not the way into Wikipedia. Nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt Felipe Tristan from having to have better references than YouTube videos and the self-published websites of directly affiliated organizations. Bearcat (talk) 14:17, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:17, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:17, 3 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete due to advertorial tone (name-dropping cities and awards to imply notability) without actual WP:RS to back that up and pass WP:GNG. The likely conflict of interest is also a concern; the article would have to be written from the ground up regardless of notability at this point. Yee no   (talk) 🍁 18:04, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete due to the lack of reliable sources it looks like a GNG fail, but even if it was a pass the article would likely have to be TNTed. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:58, 10 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.