Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fellowship of United Methodists in Music and Worship Arts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jenks24 (talk) 18:05, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Fellowship of United Methodists in Music and Worship Arts

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn (talk) 21:14, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, notability not established. Google search indicates it's a pretty large organization, but didn't give me the kind of hits I could use to establish notability or expand the article. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:25, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:19, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:19, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:20, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Orlady (talk) 13:55, 12 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Potential keep as an organisation providing servicesn and training to local churches it might be notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:00, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 18:19, 17 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep As above. J 1982 (talk) 19:56, 17 August 2014 (UTC)


 * note to closing admin has made 6 identical keep as above !votes in 4 minutes. LibStar (talk) 12:12, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * delete fails WP:ORG. No significant third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 12:30, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 17:13, 24 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per above - Fails ORG. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  22:46, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG. CesareAngelotti (talk) 20:33, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is no less significant or notable than https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presbyterian_Association_of_Musicians; and there is no ongoing attempt to delete that page. talk 15:53, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Please note that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument in a deletion discussion. Boleyn (talk) 19:00, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Then be consistent. Start a deletion discussion on the PAM page. jrn0074 (talk) 19:08, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.