Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fellside Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. W.marsh 02:45, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Fellside Records

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unnotable label that fails WP:MUSIC. Brewcrewer 06:23, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I think it has some potential. Especially if the founders wikilinks become active by someone starting those articles. Not a whole lot of content, but I see potential. Especially with maybe a logo etc. I'll tag it up for improvement. Carter | Talk to me 10:21, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Week keep. This implies that there should be material to base an article on. However, to really establish notability we need more than a piece in the local paper. As for the founders, I doubt whether any notability beyond the label is likely. Nuttah68 10:27, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep I wrote it. Note criterion number 12: "Has been the subject of a half hour or longer broadcast across a national radio or TV network". It qualifies for retention by virtue of the BBC radio broadcast. No further discussion necessary. Ogg 14:51, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per ogg. Article needs to be expanded to included references that expand on notability.  /Blaxthos 17:54, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * For goodness sake, lads, I have added more than enough to justify the retention of this article. You're asking me to sweat blood. I have added some more information. Now let it lie. Ogg 09:14, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep This article is a stub, but not worse than many other stubs I've seen. The fact that the label still has records in print is Notable, but "The Amazon website lists over 130 titles still in print" is not. Needs to be expanded, how about links, how about descriptions of some of these albums or a list of all of them. Dannygutters 17:58, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * In Light of recent updates to the article, I update my reccomendation to Strong keep. It is much richer than it was, good work Ogg. Dannygutters 14:27, 18 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.