Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Female telenovela villains


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:48, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Female telenovela villains

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. OR essay. tgies (talk) 09:53, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:OR, WP:RS.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 10:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:OR. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  17:53, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears to be original research, no reliable sources. RobJ1981 (talk) 20:29, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Potentially bottomless list that will always by defintion be POV... although I did enjoy the dramatic flourish at the end of the intro. Townlake (talk) 22:27, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Save Please do not delete this right now. At least give it a chance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.250.63.207 (talk) 16:58, 7 June 2008 (UTC)  — 84.250.63.207 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Fold content into the articles on the series, or on the character if applicable, then delete. Squidfryerchef (talk) 19:08, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment erm, does anyone have any idea what this relates to? I'm baffled. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:43, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Latin soap operas, Casliber. Squidfryerchef (talk) 04:00, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Ahaaaa. muy bien Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:26, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.