Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feminine capital


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Feminine Capital. And merge from history as needed.  Sandstein  11:06, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Feminine capital

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Content fork of information that would be better served in the main Feminism article, where 'feminine capital' is not mentioned once. Readers are unlikely to find this information here, and it does not seem to be a neologism that needs a standalone article. InsertCleverPhraseHere  20:54, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Feminine capital is a new term, coined in the last year and half. This is apparent in the book "Feminine Capital" http://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=22349. Maybe it should also be refered to in "Feminism" but I do believe it can also stand on its own as its own term. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinjsp (talk • contribs) 20:57, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- I suspect it may be a way to promote the book Feminine Capital: Unlocking the Power of Women Entrepreneurs by Barbara Orser, Catherine Elliott, so WP:PROMO applies. I did not find similar references in other works, so it seems to be a term to promote this concept / book on the concept. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:49, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Perhaps, but as I said here and in the AfD for Entrepreneurial feminism, I think the major problem with these articles is that they are content forks where the information contained within would simply be better served elsewhere.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  08:40, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Feminine Capital. Unlocking the Power of Women Entrepreneurs as this is the name of the book Oster has authored; the useful content can be pulled from the editing history. I don't think that the term "feminine capital" has entered the mainstream yet. K.e.coffman (talk) 15:42, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * merge with 'entrepreneurial feminism. Pwolit iets (talk) 08:23, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:11, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to Entrepreneurial feminism, a sufficiently similar concept, but then Redirect to Feminine Capital, which is both closely connected to the subject and, of course, has the same name. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 19:42, 27 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.