Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fenestration testing laboratory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Fenestration testing laboratory

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. I would be interested to hear from anyone who works more in this area. Boleyn (talk) 16:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)


 * delete I would suggest the article's original author, whom I suspect worked for Fenestration Testing Laboratory, Inc. to judge by their first edit and by the style of the article. Along the way, someone decided that Fenestration Testing Laboratory was a term and not the name of a company, and so, here we are. I don't think the company is notable, and the notion of testing windows is unremarkable. Mangoe (talk) 17:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:56, 10 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.