Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fenstead End


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 05:01, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Fenstead End

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable subject. Fenstead End is a tiny hamlet within Boxted Parish. It has no real notability, there is not alot that could be written about it anyway. I have searched and searched for information and history to add to the article, but I can't find anything. The only reference the article has is an atlas, just the prove the place even exists. The sensible option would be to delete the page and include Fenstead End as a section within it's parish's page (Boxted, Suffolk). This is in-keeping with the majority of other small hamlets who have no notability and about which not a lot can be said. Rushton2010 (talk) 18:17, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:43, 15 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete not notable-- mediator_ram -  talk2me  22:49, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Boxted, Suffolk. The useful contnet is already there, so that there is nothing to merge.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:30, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 01:02, 22 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep There is certainly more that can be said about the place, such as its appearance in the Domesday book nearly 1000 years ago - see the Open Domesday. Any settlement with such a long history is worth keeping.  Warden (talk) 12:00, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - after improvements by CW; our practice has been to keep articles on clearly designated inhabited settlements (essay WP:NPLACE). Having said that there is much logic in a merge to Boxted as a separate section which would produce a more worthwhile page and be helpful to the reader by having all information on the parish on the one page. There is, though, no case for a straight delete or redirect (we cant delete and merge for GFDL reasons). My view is that the AfD should be closed as keep then, if required, there can be a separate merge discussion as an editorial matter. The Whispering Wind (talk) 13:29, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NPLACE and then initiate a merge request if a merge seems preferable to a stand-alone article. Deor (talk) 12:45, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.