Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferhat Odabaşı


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JForget 01:57, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Ferhat Odabaşı

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

fails notability? (I can't find anything notable on him).. not to mention quaility guidelines of WP:BIO Alan  -  talk  00:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. - Eastmain (talk • contribs)  00:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. See these references from Google news: http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Ferhat+Odabasi%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&btnG=Search+Archives and this Google translation of that search  - Eastmain (talk • contribs)  00:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  — Eastmain (talk • contribs)  00:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.  — Eastmain (talk • contribs)  00:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  — Eastmain (talk • contribs)  00:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * and what has he done that's notable? has he won many awards? is he in a hall of fame? is he the highest paid player in the league? exactly what makes him notable, and why isn't it in the article so it passes Quality guidelines? Alan  -  talk  02:26, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Please see Athlete, which states that "People who have competed at the fully professional level of a sport, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport such as swimming, golf or tennis" are considered notable. — Eastmain (talk • contribs)  07:13, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * That's the additional requirements.. it's failing the basic requirements Alan  -  talk  08:04, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The 'additional requirements' state: A person is generally notable if they meet any of the following standards.  Jujutacular  T · C 13:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - assuming the article is accurate, he has made fully professional appearances. matt91486 (talk) 20:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - Based on the TFF reference on the article, he has only played for TFF First League teams, or in a lower division. I don't know if the Turkish second division is fully proffessional or not. If it is then Keep since he would clearly meet WP:ATHLETE. If not, Delete since he would fail that guideline and he fails WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:25, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - article about athlete who has played in the top (fully-pro) league of Turkey (albeit briefly) and is the subject of numerous coverage in the Turkish press (e.g., this). I'm struggling to find much English-language coverage, but that's not reason enough to delete. Jogurney 22:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep passes ATHLETE having played in Süper Lig, sources provided, additional coverage is out there if anyone has a mind to improve the article.-- Club Oranje T 09:54, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * When did he play in the Süper Lig? Accoridng to the TFF source, his time at Gençlerbirliği OFTAŞ was while they where in the First League. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:01, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * He played in the Süper Lig during August and September 2007 (check either of the Guardian Stats Centre or TFF sources for confirmation). It's only five matches, but it should be enough, and he's made 81 second level appearances, which is probably a fully-pro level. Jogurney (talk) 13:51, 8 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - I completely missed the fact that he played for Gençlerbirliği OFTAŞ in the Super Lig when I checked the sources. He clearly passes WP:ATHLETE, and should therefore be kept. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.