Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fernando N. Villarreal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Chiefly due to poor article quality, the subjects may be notable. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:08, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Fernando N. Villarreal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Incomprehensible, filled with information that has nothing to do with subject. Single reference does not mention subject. ubiquity (talk) 15:40, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because they follow the same pattern:


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. ubiquity (talk) 16:27, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. ubiquity (talk) 16:27, 23 August 2016 (UTC)


 * While all four of them technically have a valid claim of notability, i.e. having served as (interim) governors of the Mexican state of Querétaro, all four of them are sourced for shit and the articles themselves are written so badly that it's nearly impossible to make heads or tails of what they're even saying. In two of the four cases, the article was so poorly written that it took the category declaration for me to even realize that "Governor of Queretaro" was their notability claim — and one of them seems to contain a personal "rest in peace, distinguished forefather" prayer that falls far outside the scope of what Wikipedia is for. Even a valid claim of notability does not exempt an article from having to follow our content and style and sourcing rules. Delete all per WP:TNT, without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can write and source them better than this. Bearcat (talk) 00:14, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per nominator. Source is a blog. David. moreno 72    07:09, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete They are all written and edited by a sock farm, now CU blocked - by me. There's good evidence that all of them are actually socks of but the CU data is stale. Interestingly, this article is one of a number deleted last year on es.wiki 28 May 2015 22:20 Taichi ( discussion · contributions ) deleted page Agustín Pérez Herrera (mass Elimination of pages created by the user 189.234.215.254) June 19, 2014 8:06 Taichi ( discussion · contributions ) deleted page Agustín Pérez Herrera (mass Elimination of pages created by the user 189,234,220,216) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doug Weller (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.