Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fernando Romero


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jenks24 (talk) 08:18, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Fernando Romero

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

This topic may have the potential for inclusion, but as it stands it would need to be entirely rewritten so as to not appear as an autobiography or resume. It should be deleted without prejudice for recreation provided that the new article is in line with WP:NOTRESUME. West Eddy (talk) 00:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:57, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:58, 8 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete fails badly Wikipedia standards of WP:NPOV, WP:COI and WP:V, and is nothing to be saved in it. It claims that "Fernando designed the winning entry for the Casa da Música competition in Porto" but the official website credits Rem Koolhaas, while he is mentioned as part of a larger team, and neither press coverage does credit him. -- ELEKHHT 22:43, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JohnCD (talk) 19:55, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Keep. I see sufficient coverage in independent sources to establish notability (e.g. here and here). Sources like this and this show that Mr. Romero was not just a member of the team that designed the Casa da Música, but had a special position there. Potentially repairable WP:NPOV, WP:COI and WP:V issues are not a sufficient reason for deletion. --Lambiam 21:25, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * All right, those are interesting sources, but will have to get a multiple issues tag if kept without being rewriten. -- ELEKHHT 01:52, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per the sources herein from User:Lambiam above, which demonstrate topic notability. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:47, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → TheSpecialUser TalkContributions* 07:49, 22 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Just about enough sources for notability. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:10, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.