Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fernhag


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Scheyern. Star  Mississippi  13:59, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Fernhag

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is absolute nonsense. There are no reliable sources to prove it. The only accurate sentence is the first one, but it doesn't contain a lot information. And there is not really more information, even the German wikipedia hasn't an article about it. Furthermore, this village could also mentioned in the article Scheyern, which is the article for the municipality of Fernhag. 958s (talk) 16:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:50, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Why do I spend hours to write accurate and well researched articles that get deleted without discussion here at enwiki while nonsense like that needs to be discussed instead of the obvious speedy deletion? --DerMaxdorfer (talk) 21:28, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I was not sure if this article meets the criteria for speed deletion, because the first sentence is technically correct, but it doesn't contain a lot of information. 958s (talk) 20:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
 * delete The first sentence is technically correct but incomplete. The rest is unsourced POV. --MB-one (talk) 07:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
 * No POV, but obviously complete fiction. --DerMaxdorfer (talk) 12:12, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Of course the nonsense should be removed, but what is left is hardly worth a redirect to Scheyern, the municipality this vollage belongs to. —Kusma (talk) 11:55, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirectto Scheyern, after Deleting the page. I did rm the nonsense, but it should be deleted as a hoax or attack.  // Timothy :: talk  11:02, 4 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.