Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferns N Petals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. If an editor wants to work on this article in Draft space, let me know or ask at WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 23:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Ferns N Petals

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Promotional piece, with very poor sourcing. This actually looks like something from a real newspaper, but there is no byline and it reads like a press release. Drmies (talk) 17:13, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India.  Delta  space 42  (talk • contribs) 17:14, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:44, 26 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The byline is present, but easily missed. It is from a news agency called PTI. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:33, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
 * @MPGuy2824 that's not a byline. A byline gives the name of the journalist who wrote the piece. -- asilvering (talk) 23:29, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 * You're right, of course. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:11, 8 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep and tag for promotion, Although it seems that the only available press coverage of this company is trivial, there is significant coverage in a number of text books.

SailingInABathTub 🛁 14:43, 1 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Ganesha811 (talk) 19:59, 1 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 09:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

*Redirect to Eisai_(company) – the sources brought up include mere passing mentions, which don’t meet WP:SIGCOV. TLA (talk) 07:23, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article is clearly promotional and full of puffery. The coverage in textbooks as listed above appears to be trivial, as well as the press coverage. Redtree21 (talk) 11:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Source 3 is a RS, more of a description of the founder than the company, I'd use it for GNG. I can't find much else though... Oaktree b (talk) 15:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Draftify – It’s WP:PROMOy with press releases. Text books might be interesting, could be WP:TOOSOON  TLA  (talk) 07:15, 14 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.