Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferns STD


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete as full of lies. DS (talk) 05:06, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Ferns STD
Hoaxy. "Pteris Nodulosa groinus" gets 0 GHits, not to mention that hosing yourself down with herbicide seems like a bad idea. Source links are unrelated. sho y  06:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC) Delete All the sources are unreleated! Firsts source: An AIDs advocate, second source: a lawn fertilizer company Third source: A biodiversity company VivioFa teFan   (Talk, Sandbox) 06:46, 6 January 2008 (UTC) obviously not a hoax. The Ferns plagues the people of the upper north west of our country. please do not abuse your deletion privileges.
 * My concern is as to whether this is a hoax article. Whether or not it is deleted, it needs to be marked for sources Rotovia (talk) 06:34, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, possibly Speedy under G3; if it were legitimate (i.e., not a hoax), I'd imagine there would be no sources rather than a link leading to solutions regarding lawn/garden issues. Article is also creator's only edit, and account made 35 minutes prior to creation. Aeternitas827 (talk) 06:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, a hoax 124.170.178.251 (talk) 07:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, oblviously a hoax.ratman9999 (talk)  03:49, 7 january 2008
 * Delete as hoax. Pteris nodulosa is real but this disease is not. Both Ferns STD and Pteris Nodulosa groinus got 0 hits in Pubmed and Google Scholar. (Gut feeling says it is a hoax but I made the searches anyway.) -- Lenticel ( talk ) 08:59, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Kill the weed - sorry :P couldnt help it. (Delete as hoax) Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  11:07, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Magioladitis (talk) 11:19, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone else's reasons. A probable hoax. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 14:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. clearly a hoax. Tim Ross ·talk  14:56, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Snowball delete as hoax per everyone above. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 16:07, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. And WP:SNOW.  Malinaccier (talk) 17:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Snowball delete as a hoax. Someguy1221 (talk) 21:34, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.