Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferrari Challenge (video game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:06, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Ferrari Challenge (video game)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Tagged as WP:OR since June and never fixed. No independent sources cited. Needs to be fixed or gone per WP:V, WP:NOR and WP:RS. Guy (Help!) 21:19, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 21:22, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. ...You are aware that the release date of the game is before the scheduled end of this AfD? --Kiz o r  21:35, 22 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep I'm inclined to think pretty much every released-in-stores Playstation 3 game is notable. There's certainly no shortage of professional reviews, as Metacritic shows. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  22:02, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. I agree with Starblind that pretty much any PS3 game is going to be notable and have enough reliable material for a stub at minimum. &mdash; brighterorange  (talk) 22:18, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep — when this game gets released, we will surely have plenty of verifiable, third-party sources present. Hence, there is no crystalballery present; the WP:OR should go away provided BOLD editors work on this article. MuZemike (talk) 22:31, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Those policies do nto include exceptions for things that will one day be sourceable. Feel free to add sources that exist right now. Guy (Help!) 12:14, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * But the game is coming out in 3 days time. It's better here to ignore all rules and keep the article around as opposed to deleting the article and then recreating it. MuZemike (talk) 12:41, 23 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Subject is clearly notable, if sourcing is an issue then tag the article as such. Someoneanother 05:04, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, unsourced articles need sourcing / cleanup. If you cannot do that, put on a tag rather than nominate for deletion. --Reinoutr (talk) 17:23, 25 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.