Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferrari Vision Gran Turismo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Vision Gran Turismo. Liz Read! Talk! 08:08, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Ferrari Vision Gran Turismo

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Doesn't pass WP:LASTING. Sources all from a period of a couple of days. Tried G7 but apparently 98.5% authorship isn't enough. X750. Spin a yarn? Articles I've screwed over? 07:54, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to Vision Gran Turismo per WP:ATD. It doesn't seem like this individual car is independently notable. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to Vision Gran Turismo. Does not have enough references to even somewhat indicate notability. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:28, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Motorsport,  and Italy. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 15:30, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 *  Procedural close per WP:POINT based on the recent edit history of the article. Bad-faith nomination in an attempt to "knock the pieces off the board" after being involved in a content dispute over the placing of a notability tag. This should have been resolved with discourse on the talk page instead of trying to G7 the article. For his part, gets a TROUT for edit warring to replace the tag without going to talk either. AfD is the wrong venue at this time. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 15:43, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure I follow. Are you saying it's inappropriate to send an article to AFD when there's a dispute on its notability or whether or not it should be merged...? Sergecross73   msg me  15:47, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The nominator of this AfD is the creator of the article. in this diff (with an edit summary of fucks sake alright you win) they tried to G7 the article because Piotrus edit warred to add a notability tag. Neither of them discussed this tag on the talk page, which should have been done before coming here. The nominator clearly thinks the article is notable, but has given up because of the behavior of Piotrus. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 15:52, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * It's a bit out of the ordinary, but I don't see a need to close it. Especially since there already seems to be a consensus forming. It could end up being good documentation of a consensus for the future. Sergecross73   msg me  16:50, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Fair. The nature of how we're here shouldn't discount the opinions of the uninvolved !voters above. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 17:45, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge. Content is based on a press release that got reprinted/reworded in few other sources. This doesn't pass WP:GNG. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 15:50, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to Vision Gran Turismo - Honestly, I think the section about it in the main article is already decent enough that a merge would not actually be needed and a simple Redirect would suffice, but as the consensus is clearly leaning towards some kind of merge occurring, I will go with that. Clearly not a notable enough topic for a standalone article - as pointed out, all of the coverage is just various outlets reporting on the same press release. Rorshacma (talk) 18:26, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to Vision Gran Turismo. Fails notability standards to warrant its own article.  Hansen Sebastian Talk 04:35, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge. As an alternative to deleting this article, the topic of which has some encyclopedic content and is tangentially notable, I would boldly propose merging with Vision Gran Turismo. Notability isn’t sufficient for a stand-alone article, although there is some notability in the context of Vision Gran Turismo, which would be the best merge target here. Shawn Teller (talk) 03:38, 9 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.