Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferroconcrete


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 15:43, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Ferroconcrete

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Deprodded. Claims a bunch of awards but they look to be mere trinkets. No sources found for the company at all, just trivial mentions or false positives. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:18, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello. The article is relevant to the worldwide design community. The awards are recognized and respected within the worldwide design community. The sources: AIGA, Communication Arts, How Magazine, Fast Company, etc. are recognized and respected throughout the worldwide design community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Frankharperwortham (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:50, 8 May 2012 (UTC).
 * Completely subjective that they're "Recognized and respected". Those are just peacock words. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:31, 9 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. Fast Company (magazine), HOW (magazine) and Communication Arts (magazine) are reliable sources but only How seems to give significant coverage (although Fast Company's Co.Design website doesn't seem to work for me, so there may be something there).  The Dieline also has significant coverage but I'm less sure it's a reliable source - it's not produced by a professional publishing company though it does claim to have an editorial structure; if it's reliable then its coverage together with the other refs might establish notability. --Colapeninsula (talk) 12:10, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 9 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 15 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, strongly. Another advertising agency, putting on ridiculous airs in this obviously conflicted prose: a full-service branding agency ....the company specializes in branding, strategic planning, and motion graphics, that's advertising on Wikipedia.  Petty trade awards from startup-watch buzzfeeds and ad-agency trade groups do not equate to significance in the wider world, and do not confer notability.  Strongly suggest redirection to reinforced concrete, which is the subject that obviously should be occupying this title anyways. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:36, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per conversation above, and then redirect to Reinforced concrete. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 15:41, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clearly fails notability. Robert Skyhawk (T C) 03:32, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.