Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Festenia Muse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 01:46, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Festenia Muse

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This element of the Super Robot Wars series does not establish independent notability. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, this is just made up of unnecessary plot summary, game guide material, and original research. Relevant AfDs include Articles for deletion/Database (Super Robot Wars), Articles for deletion/Arado Balanga, Articles for deletion/AS Soleares/AS Alegrías, and Articles for deletion/Ruach Ganeden, Articles for deletion/Thrudgelmir (Mecha). All resulted to deletion of the relevant articles. Magioladitis (talk) 10:50, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Discussion and consensus should be reached here. Dengero (talk)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:21, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: no reliable third-party sources cover this fictional video-game character. An article on this subject cannot exist on its own.  The personality descriptions are original research and the background history are over-detailed and in-universe.  No out-of-universe angle is offered (or could be found since no third-party reliable sources cover these).  Information (appearances and physical appearance) that can be merged into a list are non-descript; they are not unique and do not require author attribution.  Jappalang (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for the same reason all other elements of Super Robot Wars were nominated and deleted. -- nips (talk) 14:31, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources, no real-world context, nothing but fictional history and story, with a side of pointless trivia. gnfnrf (talk) 04:49, 25 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.