Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Festival of Imam Taiyyab


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Overall consensus is for deletion. NorthAmerica1000 09:11, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Festival of Imam Taiyyab

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Un notable no independent coverage and no reliable sources, does not even describe festival but only people associated with it. Summichum (talk) 08:41, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ping me if proper reliable references are found and added to the article to demonstrate how it passes Notability (events). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:58, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. I couldn't find anything to show notability. I've let WP:ISLAM know about the page and barring them finding sources in another language, this just doesn't seem to be notable. Full disclosure: I declined an A7 speedy on this and recommended that this come to AfD instead. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 20:18, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 20:18, 9 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. please delete it now: Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) Summichum (talk) 15:46, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep for now I think we need a much more extended time to look for references on this topic. I removed yet another speedy, placedo n the basis of implementing the afd, but the afd has not yet concluded.  DGG ( talk ) 21:33, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment the nom has been placing absurd tags on multiple articles of people and places related to this sect., eg, "autobiography" and "BLP sources" on articles about places or people who died in the 11th century. In particular, the nom has also been tagging them as "han site", which might indicate the possibility of WP:POINT.   DGG ( talk ) 21:38, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: Seven days is plenty of time to find sources. If no one's found any, I don't see any reason to keep this around.  If DGG wants to fish for sources and recreate the article down the road, no objection.  Nha Trang  Allons! 21:34, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.