Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 14:06, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Feth
A fictional swear word from the Warhammer 40,000 fictional universe, in particular the Gaunts Ghosts series of novels. All that needs to be said about the swear word is located at List of fictional curse words.

I'd wealky support mentioning it in the Gaunts Ghosts article, or in the Tanith section of the History of the Imperial Guard (Warhammer 40,000), with a wikilink to the abovementioned list of curse words, but don't think the article really needs to be here, and have trouble seeing where it would serve as an appropriate redirect. -- Saberwyn - The Zoids  Expansion Project 01:02, 17 January 2006 (UTC)


 * weak keep. The article will be useful for the few people who actual care about the topic; it is slightly more useful than just the entry on the list.--ragesoss 04:13, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * When "Battlestar Galactica"'s Frack/Frak and "Star Wars"'s Sithspawn get articles, I'd consider it. Anyway, at the moment, the article says, in a really 'wordy' way, almost exactly what the entry in the list says, with the addition that the series is part of the Warhammer 40,000 universe. -- Saberwyn


 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a fan site for any specific topic. This article belongs in a fan site wiki. SycthosTalk 04:55, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of fictional expletives per JIP. SycthosTalk 23:21, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Saberwyn and Sycthos --Qirex 05:17, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per sycthos WhiteNight T 05:38, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I play 40K, and there is no way this is notable enough for its own article. Perhaps worth a brief mention in Gaunts Ghosts, but no redirect. the wub "?!"  RFR - a good idea? 16:21, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom: not enough content to justify its own article. Turnstep 16:29, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of fictional expletives. J I P  | Talk 18:37, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nomination. --Dustimagic *\o/* (talk/contribs) *\o/* 19:34, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete from main space per nomination. -- Eddie 20:35, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * This should be deleted, full stop, not just form the mainspace. NSL E (T+C) 00:43, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete it, full stop. --Terence Ong 11:06, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of fictional expletives. Points users in the right direction without wasting their time over a not really notable word. --Pak21 21:43, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. fancruft Incognito 02:48, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Incognito. --Agamemnon2 12:29, 19 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.