Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fever (Little Nell song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:06, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Fever (Little Nell song)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable, non-charting single, bundling for discussion with the non-charting remix single of the same song. Both fail WP:NSONGS. TheJazzDalek (talk) 18:12, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —TheJazzDalek (talk) 18:14, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge & Redirect to "Fever (1956 song)", some of the content might better fit into the artist's article though. -- Avant-garde a clue - hexa Chord 2  06:38, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect A rare occasion where HexaChord and I agree. The convention is to have one article per song, not per single, so all covers should be dealt with in one article.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:15, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: I guess I've done something wrong then. Will reconsider my vote... -- Avant-garde a clue - hexa Chord 2  21:25, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Actually, I think I did: as Esradeken notes, the content isn't really appropriate for Fever (1956 song): it needs to go into Little Nell.&mdash;Kww(talk) 22:59, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment but that's exactly what I said, too. ;-) -- Avant-garde a clue - hexa Chord 2  23:16, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as a non-plausible search term, fails notability per WP:MUSIC. Nothing to merge as there are no reliable, third-party, sources. There's already a mention of the Little Nell cover version in the parent article. Merging the content of this article and not the 100 or so others that have covered it would unduly favour this artist and violate WP:NPOV.     Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 22:40, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I have to agree that merging detail into the song article would present a balance problem, but merging it into the "Little Nell" article would not.&mdash;Kww(talk) 22:48, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Insufficient independent 3rd party sources. JamesBurns (talk) 23:58, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no reliable third party sources. JoannaMinogue (talk) 08:25, 15 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.