Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fever therapy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tawker (talk) 06:17, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Fever therapy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Created by the author User:Jimburnside, fails WP:GNG & WP:BOOK. Anupmehra - Let's talk!  19:05, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:57, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:57, 30 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Just in case this has been missed on the talk page, the author posted this: Thanks for the heads up. I am about to launch my self published book FEVER THERAPY with a world wide professional PR campaign that will include many invitations to review. As you may be aware self publishing represents over 70% of the overall publishing market and about 99% of new publications. I have several very favourable reviews (one from a professor of History). I apologise for not reading your submission criteria - I was preoccupied with IT issues as an amateur publicist. I am by no means an amateur writer however. I hope you will have an opportunity to read my stuff sometime and you will see the highest quality. As a writer I am here to stay. I will be careful to read all your objective criteria and do whatever is necessary to meet them.I am a strong advocate of Wikipedia. I look for your articles first by default. Of the hundreds I have accessed over the years I have only ever seen one that was of poor and subjective quality. When I have published my next three novels, which I hope to do in the next couple of months I will turn my attention to rectifying it. Best wishes, Jim.90.216.163.181 (talk) 19:35, 31 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Another self-published book with no reviews listed and no coverage in reliable sources.  I guess you can say that it's not a promotional article, at least.  Author probably didn't realize that we have inclusion criteria. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:38, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable self published book lacking non-trivial support. red dog six  (talk) 21:25, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet notability. Bali88 (talk) 02:23, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Presently, the book appears not to conform to Notability (books). Until it does, this name should be a redirect to Pyrotherapy. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 17:42, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.