Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fey Truscott-Sade (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Companion (Doctor Who). (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm (talk) 17:23, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Fey Truscott-Sade
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

While a rather notable character in universe and a Companion, the article cites no sources and my BEFORE didn't turn up any results. It's highly possible that some information on things such as development of the character may exist in physical sources, but I don't believe that it's enough to justify this character's article existing separately. She's listed at both the Companions and Supporting Doctor Who characters article, so a redirect would be a viable alternative to deletion. Pokelego999 (talk) 15:32, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy,  and Comics and animation. Pokelego999 (talk) 15:32, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Completely unsourced, and they do not seem to have the sources available that are required for notability. I would not be opposed to a redirect if a good target is found. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:28, 2 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment: @Pokelego999: Can you explain why you withdrew your first AfD on this subject? Let&#39;srun (talk) 21:39, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Long story short, I nominated too many AfDs at once when I first nominated this, alongside many other articles. I ended up withdrawing many that hadn't been replied to as a result. Pokelego999 (talk) 21:45, 2 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Question Have Women in Doctor Who, p. 164, and Companions - Fifty Years of Doctor Who Assistants been considered as secondary sources? There's also a short mention in Encyclopedia of Weird War Stories, p. 59. Daranios (talk) 15:17, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
 * From what I can tell of source three, it seems to be a passing mention, and the Companions book doesn't seem to go beyond basic plot information. I'm unsure of Women in Doctor Who as I can't access Page 164 in question, but even still, I don't think these are enough to justify the article. Even if Women in Doctor Who gives a boatload of info and analysis, it's one source as the entirety of the character's reception. There'd need to be more there, and unless it exists in physical media, nothing else could be found. The other two sources would be handy for discussing background information in the article more than anything. I just don't think it's enough for the article to stand on. Pokelego999 (talk) 15:30, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
 * So aside from the fact, that some plot summary is fine when balanced by real-world commentary, the question would be, where would the content from Women in Doctor Who go? I guess it's an academic question for now as no such content is yet present. I guess it could go to Companion (Doctor Who), but would break the current page structure. Daranios (talk) 07:22, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete/Redirect as WP:ATD. There isn't enough WP:SIGCOV, but there is a valid redirect target where this can be mentioned. Shooterwalker (talk) 23:32, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect, I guess to Companion (Doctor Who), for the time being. We have one extended secondary source and one with plot summary (+one comment on bisexuality), so there is something encyclopedic to cover on the character, but it seems below the WP:GNG threshold so far. The page history should be preserved for future use, and WP:REDIRECTSARECHEAP. Daranios (talk) 07:22, 7 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.