Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fhink Master


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete --Steve (Stephen)talk 06:11, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Fhink Master

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article about a non-notable training course. Prod removed without comment. No independent sources. CIreland 21:10, 19 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Although it is the first edition of this program, it is notable enough when it receive over 3500 application all around the world.
 * The sources used are those that can be easily found and tracked in the web.
 * The aim of this article is just informative. If you consider it is not, please let me know and suggest any possible improvement, it is my first attempt in wikipedia. Thanks. dald07, 19 May 2007
 * You will want to check out WP:CORP, WP:N and WP:V. What CIreland is objecting to, is that the sources are not independent, not that they cannot be found.  (See WP:V in particular for an explanation of what kinds of sources Wikipedia editors look for.) Charlie 23:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete A quick web search strongly indicates that the author will fail to produce good quality third-party sources. Adrian   M. H.  16:33, 20 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Reply to Adrian_M._H.

Third party references:

1. Bloomberg - Finanza Mercati, No. 206, Friday, October 20, 2006

2. Financial Times Special Report, Monday, January 29, 2007

3. http://www.avionews.com/index.php?corpo=see_news_home.php&news_id=1073211&pagina_chiamante=index.php

Rcristi 06:09, 21 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. A rather spammy article on a sponsored Masters Degree Programme. Whilst there is the expected, press release driven, coverage there is nothing to indicate the notability of the specific course. Nuttah68 20:20, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.