Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FiLTH (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 00:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

FiLTH
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. No arguments have been given in the last AfD. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:GNG per my comments when I nominated this article at its first AFD, which was closed WP:NPASR No Consensus since no-one else had commented on that AFD. The author has not touched this article in the three months since, confirming my impression that this article was nothing but an attempt to bolster a repeatedly speedied article on the artist who supposedly created this subgenre. Meters (talk) 23:28, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  06:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as simply none of this suggests a better applicably notable article. SwisterTwister   talk  07:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Joke article. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 10:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Unsourced nonsense. Should have been speedied long ago. sixty nine   • speak up •  01:56, 19 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.